Professional Network Engagement Boost: Women Find Success When Presenting to be Men
Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?
If not, the reason could be that you're not male.
The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach
Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.
Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.
Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up
The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ professional networking terminology.
Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.
Company Statement
In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.
Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.
Individual Results
A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.
"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.
Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.
The Process
- Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
- Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
- Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language
The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.
The Negative Aspect
Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.
"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."
She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."
Mixed Results
Not all participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.
"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.
Wider Consequences
These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.
Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.
System Details
According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.
The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."
Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.
Changing Landscape
As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.
"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."