🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to implement a redrawn congressional map that may create up to five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, grants a request by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and disturbing the sensitive balance of power in elections, the order stated in justifying its action.

The district court had previously found that Texas had likely grouped voters based on their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the new maps. It had ordered the state to revert to the districts established after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

With a sharply worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's ruling. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its ruling was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's new map, with all its increased partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a breach of the constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

This decision occurs during a countrywide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican majority. Ordinarily, redistricting takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, for their part, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State top lawyer welcomed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation favorable to his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he added.

In contrast, opposition party representatives lamented the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

A senior Democratic figure argued the court had yet again eroded its standing by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.