🔗 Share this article

In my role as a DM, I traditionally shied away from heavy use of randomization during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. My preference was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be guided by player choice as opposed to the roll of a die. However, I opted to alter my method, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Observing a Custom Mechanic

A popular podcast features a DM who frequently requests "chance rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails picking a polyhedral and assigning potential outcomes contingent on the result. While it's at its core no unlike rolling on a random table, these get invented spontaneously when a character's decision has no obvious resolution.

I decided to try this technique at my own game, primarily because it seemed engaging and provided a departure from my normal practice. The results were fantastic, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated balance between planning and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional In-Game Example

During one session, my players had just emerged from a city-wide conflict. Afterwards, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a pair—had survived. Rather than choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both died; on a 5-9, only one succumbed; on a 10+, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a profoundly moving moment where the party found the corpses of their friends, still holding hands in their final moments. The cleric conducted a ceremony, which was uniquely meaningful due to prior story developments. As a parting touch, I chose that the forms were strangely transformed, revealing a enchanted item. I rolled for, the item's contained spell was exactly what the party required to address another critical story problem. You simply orchestrate these kinds of serendipitous moments.

Sharpening DM Agility

This experience caused me to question if chance and making it up are truly the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. Although you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles need exercise. Players reliably excel at derailing the best constructed narratives. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to pivot effectively and invent content on the fly.

Utilizing luck rolls is a fantastic way to train these skills without straying too much outside your preparation. The key is to use them for minor situations that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. For instance, I would not employ it to determine if the main villain is a traitor. Instead, I might use it to decide whether the characters reach a location just in time to see a major incident unfolds.

Enhancing Player Agency

Spontaneous randomization also serves to maintain tension and cultivate the sensation that the game world is responsive, evolving based on their actions in real-time. It combats the perception that they are merely characters in a pre-written story, thereby bolstering the cooperative aspect of storytelling.

This philosophy has historically been integral to the original design. Original D&D were filled with encounter generators, which suited a game focused on exploration. Even though current D&D often emphasizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, this isn't always the required method.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

It is perfectly no problem with doing your prep. However, it's also fine nothing wrong with letting go and allowing the rolls to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Authority is a big part of a DM's responsibilities. We require it to manage the world, yet we can be reluctant to release it, even when doing so might improve the game.

My final recommendation is this: Do not fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Experiment with a little randomness for smaller details. The result could discover that the organic story beat is significantly more rewarding than anything you could have pre-written in advance.